[zipper]

The football game programming analogy is a straw man argument — there are significant differences in situational control, influence, and degree that must be considered, though I agree some sports programming recently is politically charged and that is itself offensive. But by comparison sports programming is passive. You can’’t assume the bar supports BLM because a few sports players kneel, and of course the bar does not control what the sports players on TV wear. The bar does control what the servers wear — in fact it’s policy that comes directly from management, which has foremost on its mind consideration of the concept of customer service. Don’t allow your servers to wear political campaign buttons. Your servers represent the bar directly, so don’t have them provoking customers with political grandstanding. Have you ever seen a server wearing a political campaign button? Of course not. BLM is much more offensive than a Biden or Trump button — this is a self-declared revolutionary movement terrorizing ordinary citizens and is responsible for an estimated $2 billion in damages, so far.

If he didn’t notice the game on the TV until after ordering he should’ve finished his drink and left, and if not leaving me a tip, should not have mentioned why.

Yeah right, insert tail between legs, run for the exit. Take the cowardly way out. Don’t risk getting doxxed! It’s just a button, we don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings, we are guilty of privilege, who are we to question their Marxist pin collection? They have a right to rub our privileged face in BLM propaganda, but we as nice compliant weasels just want to get along. Go along to get along! Don’t challenge the revolution, maybe they won’t come for you.

Let me tell you, they may as well wear Nazi armbands — there is no functional distinction between the evils of Marxism and Naziism — BLM is a Marxist movement, just ask the founders and leaders of BLM. This is not a game. It’s a threat to the very foundations of our country.

I don’t blame him for being upset, or for arguing with some other numbskull employee he thought was the manager, who for all we know was the antagonist in the ensuing argument.

And I certainly don’t care about sparing anyone’s feelings — like Ben Shapiro says, if we have freedom of speech and BLM Marxists take full advantage of that fact and then some — why should we let them off the hook, EVER? They are responsible for $2 billion in damages and counting — and it continues because average citizens cower before them.

The man was doxxed and suffered from retaliation because he attacked the sacred cow of BLM at a time when white guilt and white privilege are recurrent BLM themes, endorsed by the MSM and tolerated by spineless citizen sheep, many of whom won’t even show up to cast a secret vote to end it in November.

[zencycler]

So if you don’t like the football game analogy, then try the Christian baker allergy.

Whose side are you on?

The Christian baker that wants to run their business as they see fit?

Or the gay customer who gets angry and argues (or worse) because they won’t bake the cake that they want?

Explain to me how the customer who gets angry and argues over the BLM button instead of quietly walking out is any different than the gay customer also gets angry and argues that the private business won’t do what they want, instead of quietly taking their business elsewhere - something you continually referred to as cowardice.