Wisconsin and Michigan are in the bag for Trump so no need for the adds.
Moreover, the article does not say that he is cutting all money from these states. It says CUTTING BACK on money. Big difference. And all of the new four states mentioned to which he is sending money are closely contested Battleground states. I am particularly glad he is putting a little extra into Arizona and North Carolina, where there are important Senate races.
I’d think there would be no need for paid advertisement in Wisconsin since the rioters are doing it for free.
Only the legal votes.
I think he is trying to finish off AZ,FL, and NC. Then come back I’m 10 days and sit in MI, MN, and WI.
Can I have some of what you’re smoking?
MI is far from “in the bag” for Trump. Sure..enthusiasm is high in all the expected counties.
But we better hope those counties counter Detroit, Ann Arbor, Lansing, Pontiac, etc. Which they likely will not.
I’m actually pretty concerned that Trump has pulled advertising from MI. John James is doing well against Peters here. The fact Trump has pulled ads is IMHO not good.
“Wisconsin and Michigan are in the bag for Trump so no need for the adds.”
Facts not in evidence.