Posted on 10/08/2020 6:54:41 AM PDT by agatheringstorm
The linked video shows the end of Mike Pence's response to Harris' call to see Trump's taxes, etc. That's not the point, here though. Listen carefully as the moderator says, right near the end of Pence's response, "You know that's a good segue into our third topic..." and beneath that you hear Kamala say "That's a great segue."
So, tell me, how would Harris know it was "a great segue" if she didn't know the topic that was coming up? If she didn't know what topic was coming next, what did she mean by "That's a great segue"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q__CEb3dRqw&feature=youtu.be&t=1485
How about the moderator calling her Kamala, like she was just over for a glass of wine the night before.
That was weird. Well, not weird if you understand that they cheat.
If she knew the questions and still did that bad she is really a loser.
That jumped out at me immediately last night.
I thought providing questions in advance to demonrat campaigns was standard protocol.....
I believe that the moderators meet up with the dimrats prior to the “debates” to prep the candidates. The dims are always ready for the questions.
But she didn’t know what Pence would say. He got her good on her record and Joe’s own words raising taxes.
Harris brought up lies about Trump and the military. Pence should have said disputed by 19 people.
I noticed that also. Most of the questions eluded to negative things about Trump policy. Not much digging into Biden’s policies. Pence had to ask his own questions in order to flush them out.
and couldn’t remember the answers ? LOL
Understanding conversational segues do not indicate knowledge beforehand. That may have been scripted, yes, but good segues can occur extemporaneously as well
Check this out ..
https://www.amazon.com/Madam-Speaker-Nancy-Pelosi-Lessons/dp/1538750694
Susan Page has a book coming out next spring. Bet it won’t be an expose.
The publisher is an imprint owned by Hachette, which is owned by Lagardère, a European company.
Talk about foreign interference.
Fracking no fracking was amusing. No answer twice to stacking SCOTUS said it all.
Yep, pointed that out to my wife as soon as it happened. Kamala let it slip, and I hope someone in the media picks up on it. Maybe Rush, Hannity or Tucker.
It is a big rigged media show, but the Demonrats are typically so incompetent that they screw things up anyway.
I heard it and thought the same thing. Even if true she still was awful. Not a single redeeming quality.
Personally, I think the Democrats give the debate questions to the network to make sure the ask the “right” questions the right way.
Methinks the questions are largely obvious before actually being asked, and saying “that’s a great segue to...” in a particular context can make it very clear what the next question will be.
One does not enter a serious public debate oblivious to what the questions could/will be, even if they’re not provided ahead of time.
Exactly. The dhimmicrats themselves believe that they cannot win unless they cheat. I believe that both Trump and Pence entered their respective debates fully recognizing this likelihood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.