Posted on 10/05/2020 7:37:38 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Sweden reached herd immunity without masks or economic lock-downs or vaccines.
Stop being a bleeting sheep.
That’s libs for ya. Always looking for ways to get around the rules.
But that is Sweden is a whole different country, which sad to say is not doable in the USA.
Supreme Court of MI: “The orders are void because the law claims an unlimited unilateral power to the executive without checks and balances to the legislature.”
Whitler’s MDHHS: “You only said that law — but here’s another one that allows the executive to do whatever it wants. You didn’t search the whole MCL for every abusable law and rule them all out at once. Nanny nanny boo boo.”
Let the emergency stay proceed and the civil suits pile on.
Herd ammunity is achievable in the US we need to protect the vulnerable while the younger and health go about their lives creating herd immunity for the country this lockdown crap if ridiculous the minute people go out the virus comes back absurd!! We NEED herd immunity PERIOD!!
I’m not going to look, but
I’ll be surprised if there is written legislative law which Wis. gov is now basing it’s edict upon.
J. Edgar Hoover was also adamantly opposed to the Japanese interment.
Why not doable in the USA?
Wouldn’t surprise me a bit if there are laws from the Spanish Flu epidemic that gives this power to the state’s Executive.
No one wants a health emergency response to be directed by judges.
Does seem like the Governor isn’t doing a very good job. But no one probably even considered how she’d perform in a health emergency when they elected her- so it’s on the voters IMO.
Note MCL 332.2263:
“Sec. 2263.
(1) Not later than 20 days after receipt of the citation, the alleged violator may petition the department for an administrative hearing, which shall be held within 60 days after receipt of the petition by the department. The administrative hearing may be conducted by a hearings officer who may affirm, dismiss, or modify the citation. The decision of the hearings officer shall be final, unless within 30 days after the decision the director grants a review of the citation. Upon review, the director may affirm, dismiss, or modify the citation.
(2) Hearings and appeals under this section shall conform to the administrative procedures act of 1969.
(3) A civil penalty shall become final if a petition for an administrative hearing is not received within the time specified in subsection (1). A civil penalty imposed shall be paid to the state treasury for deposit in the general fund. A civil penalty may be recovered in a civil action brought in the county in which the violation occurred or the defendant resides.”
I would never encourage anyone to willfully muck up the system, but administrative hearings require one of a few administrative law judges, referees, a lengthy process and exceed the potential fine in the cost to conduct one.
Further, even if one were deemed to owe the $1000, not paying it would oblige the State to expend further monies on a civil suit to get a ruling for the ‘violator’ to pay. That’s a lot of time and $ for them to spend even presuming you are unfortunate enough to live in a place where your LEOs will enforce this travesty.
Lastly, does your elected sheriff or PA want to make the news as MDHHS’ jackboot enforcers right before an election? Hmm.
I didn’t say the Dems weren’t for internment. But so we’re the Republicans. Both Republican and Democrat leaders in California gave the initial push for it. The governor (Olson) was Democrat and the AG (Warren) was Republican
l8r 4
“Lock them all up”
Not going to happen...revolt. Everyone votes for Trump
bttt
I had a hunch back in June, was it, by her gleeful expression as she joined and validated mass protest with BLM, using George Floyd as a cover, that Whitmer the Dominatrix, was going to be THE most hardcore lockdown fanatic ever, bar none. She must still be vying for some kind of job in an imaginary Biden Administration.
You fail to see the irony and similarities, don’t you?
It really doesn’t matter if it is a governor or President who “starts it” in regards to personal liberty...
It’s all about the Personal Liberty...and the Constitution!
MG some people are obtuse.
I was responding to a post that blamed internment on Democrats. I simply pointed out it was bipartisan, some of the original proponents were Republicans. Neither party had clean hands, is my point
And stop with the name calling , please
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.