You must really be dense. You said 90% of the tests were falsely positive. Then when called on it you post your data which says that the tests are true positives, but quantity is probably trivial. Why do you not understand the difference between false positive (the positive test but the disease is not present) and low viral load.
You have no idea what you are talking about, but keep shouting. The really funny thing is that it I the data YOU PROVIDED.
I am using YOUR data. YOUR references. It must be interesting to live in your world. Sometime come try reality ... its amazing out here.
God Speed and Good Luck,
And by Good luck I mean f*ck off
Whatever...