[gw-ington]

You're [a] deranged DU troll who does nothing but spew out hysterical far left nonsense.

Now you're really going off the deep end. Sad. As I said, I believe Trump deserves reelection. But feel free to continue lying about everything I said.

You claimed Hillary Clinton was only leading by 2.3% this time in 2016. I totally debunked that piece of fiction by posting the actual RCP figures from RCP in post # 49, which you then proceeded to totally ignore and go on an insane deranged rant of foaming at the mouth garbage.

Again, you've "debunked" literally nothing. You either refuse to or simply don't understand the obvious glaring difference between a polls average and one individual poll on one specific date. I accurately quoted the 2016 & 2020 RCP polls average and its trend but you stubbornly refuse to accept any polls average. Instead, you're still comically trying to cherry-pick just a few individual polls on a specific day in 2016.

[SmokingJoe]

I debunked by posting the entire slate of polls from RCP FROM October 4 to October 15. Hilary Clinton was leading by 7,9, 11, and even 12 points is most of those polls.

[OldGoatCPO]

I read all the comments and it seems to me what people are trying to point out is when an outlier poll shows 12-14% leads for a candidate, they skew the RCP Average. I am not sure what your argument is with that? You cannot change the history of 2016, clearly the polls were wrong throughout the campaign season. The obvious proof of that is Trump is President. RCP tighten the week before the election, because the polls tightened. Do you really believe that many people changed their minds one week before the election? What changed to tighten the polls? Based on the RCP Average in September and October of 2016 Trump lost by big numbers and we are now living in an alternative universe.