I really don’t find any of her opinions particularly scholarly. Neither with Sotomyer and Hagen.
These judges give rubber stamped opinions probably written by left wing activist ghost writers.
John Roberts does the same thing.
Figure first the outcome you want, then develop the argument to achieve that outcome.
I will not rest until we have at least one more elected SCOTUS judge for Trump to appoint.
I’m predicting that he will win reelection and he will have 3 or 4 more picks within the next 4 years. Certainly 2 more.
1. Thomas
2. Sotomyer
3. Breyer
4. Alito
RE: John Roberts does the same thing.
Roberts’ Obamacare decision, where he re-imagined what clearly is a penalty to be a “tax” was one of the worst case of bench legislation I have ever seen.
President Obama himself when interviewed said that it was categorically NOT a tax.
The right decision would have been to throw the law as written back to Congress and ask them to re-write it to make it clear that it was a tax.
But no, Roberts took it upon himself to re-write it singlehandedly.