Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wiseprince
Britt Grant and it's not even close. Why They Oppose Britt Grant

Opposed Gun Safety: Ms. Grant worked on a brief in the case Friedman v. City of Highland Park, Illinois,[28] in which she challenged a local ban on AR-15 assault weapons – the type of weapon that has been used in several school shootings in recent years, including Parkland, Florida in which 17 people were killed. The Seventh Circuit upheld the ban, and Ms. Grant asked the Supreme Court to overturn that decision because the state of Georgia believes that nearly any restriction on gun possession is a violation of the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court rejected her argument.

Which is precisely why we need someone like her ON the USSC.

And labeling it "gun safety" is disingenuous; gun safety is having one when you need it and only using it appropriately.

132 posted on 09/21/2020 8:42:23 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed

This is EXACTLY the type of person who the court needs. I didn’t look into the men because Trump said it would be a woman but I want to make sure Trump gives her a fair look and not just have her be on the list as a signal. She is precisely what SCOTUS needs right now. It’s bold but they already voted for her within the last few years (52 votes). I think the 52 would have to justify NOT voting for her this time which I don’t think they can do while holding on to the Trump base.


147 posted on 09/21/2020 9:24:11 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson