Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: White Lives Matter

I doubt the SC would hear the case in time to do anything about it, and they are loathe to get involved in state election laws anyway.


3 posted on 09/17/2020 1:47:03 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
I doubt the SC would hear the case in time to do anything about it, and they are loathe to get involved in state election laws anyway.

Even if they involve a Federal election?

5 posted on 09/17/2020 1:47:54 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

USSC can fast track a case as they did in 2000 during the Bush/Gore fiasco.


22 posted on 09/17/2020 2:03:15 PM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
I doubt the SC would hear the case in time to do anything about it

They would easily expedite the case.

and they are loathe to get involved in state election laws anyway.

It's a federal office.

Regardless, if their is an aspect of any election that might be unconstitutional, of course they would get involved.

23 posted on 09/17/2020 2:04:28 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
"I doubt the SC would hear the case in time to do anything
about it, and they are loathe to get involved in
state election laws anyway."

The Supreme Court only harasses those southern states
when it comes to their state election laws.

33 posted on 09/17/2020 2:27:39 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson