do you think going armed for your own protection is always a crime and an offense against “order”? I don’t see anything despicable about Rittenhouse, why do you judge him?
here’s the statement from his attorneys ”Attorneys say accused Kenosha shooter acted in self-defense”.
“do you think going armed for your own protection is always a crime and an offense against “order”?”
OK. I’ll vacation in Afghanistan. I’ll go armed for my own protection, and it’s all hunky dory. Bad argument. But it’s moot.
In Post 115, it was already established that he did not cross state lines to join the fray, and that the arms were obtained locally. So what is the point of contention here.