Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jz638

If it’s not against the law, why leak it? Why not just give an interview to the Times?


12 posted on 08/22/2020 7:32:47 PM PDT by CaptainK ('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: CaptainK
If it’s not against the law, why leak it? Why not just give an interview to the Times?

It's all part of the deep state Kabuki of political intrigue. There are two types of leaks: sanctioned ones by people who are authorized to leak, and unsanctioned ones. The people who know, they eventually learn who the leakers are. But by revealing their names, they themselves could be leaking classified information or at a minimum become targets for retribution. The leakers don't go on the record because they wouldn't get reelected, or they would hurt the election chances of their party (or the party they actually support in the case of turncoat republicans) if they were brazenly leaking classified information for political purposes in an attributable manner.

17 posted on 08/22/2020 11:14:16 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson