Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds say Yale discriminates against Asian, white applicants
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Aug. 13, 2020 | MICHAEL BALSAMO

Posted on 08/13/2020 4:15:41 PM PDT by artichokegrower

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: artichokegrower

Schadenfreude?


21 posted on 08/13/2020 5:19:49 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
2020 Whiffenpoofs (click here)

More than tokenism.

22 posted on 08/13/2020 5:20:22 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Asians and whites should forget about the Ivy schools and let them all become Howard Universities.


23 posted on 08/13/2020 5:29:03 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Systemic liberalism is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Why are they just recognizing this now? It’s been going on for years and years and white males have been put at the bottom of the list not only for university admissions but for jobs. Sandra Day O’Connor found nothing wrong with any of this. She said it should continue indefinitely. On what basis are people from India or Mexico or El Salvador or Ecuador or Commie China the victims of discrimination in this country and entitled to “protected” status and affirmative action set asides?


24 posted on 08/13/2020 5:34:42 PM PDT by PA Presbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

they are still using the name of a slave trader and master?


25 posted on 08/13/2020 5:42:42 PM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dearolddad

Bigot. /sarc


26 posted on 08/13/2020 5:58:03 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (Three most annoying words on the internet - "Watch the video")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I would guess your friend was lied to. Race activists (lefty racists) made up the line about only Jews and Asians qualifying to shut whites up when they questioned reverse discrimination. You see, if no AA, no whites in college.


27 posted on 08/13/2020 7:23:27 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joma89

These anti white reeducation activities going on in gov., corps, and schools are discrimination, too.


28 posted on 08/13/2020 7:25:20 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PA Presbyterian

“It’s been going on for years and years”\

I ran into it in the seventies.

I did really well on the civil service exam, and was trying to find out why I couldn’t get an interview. A fellow Navy guy told me in confidence, “By the time we finish hiring black women with Spanish surnames, we never even get to any white women. You’re not getting a job.”

A decade later I did really well on the Foreign Service Exam. I showed up in appropriate attire. All that day’s interviewees were gathered in a room. A diesel dyke wearing a red plaid lumberjack shirt came in and said, “We just lost a lawsuit for discriminating against women. Of course, that won’t affect the chances of you men here today. A-hyuk, a-hyuk, a-hyuk.”

Later, in my private interview, the first thing she said to me was, “Tell me everything you know about the history of the women’s movement.”

I’ve been discriminated against for being male, for being heterosexual, for being white, for being conservative, for doing too well on the Iowa Tests in elementary school, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

So I just cried like a little girl and gave up.

Oh, wait a tick. Sorry. No, I didn’t.


29 posted on 08/14/2020 7:41:57 AM PDT by dsc (We are competing against Soros money poured onto a hive mentality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower; All
"A Justice Department investigation has found Yale University is illegally discriminating against Asian American and white applicants, in violation of federal civil rights law [??? emphasis added], officials said Thursday."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

If the well-intentioned, but nonetheless seemingly institutionally indoctrinated patriot attorneys at DOJ would start reading Free Republic, they would hopefully start doing the following.

Regarding our constitutionally limited power federal government, the attorneys would hopefully wake up and start taking the extra step in examining so-called federal law violations to make sure that a given law is reasonably based on one of the very few constitutionally enumerated powers that the states have given to the feds.

Regarding this Yale example, the states have never expressly constitutional given the unconstitutionally big federal government the specific constitutional powers to dictate policy, regulate, tax and spend for INTRAstate schools, or to make race-related civil rights laws beyond the scope of protecting voting rights.

From related threads…

Patriots are reminded that President Thomas Jefferson had indicated in a State of the Union address that the states would first need to appropriately amend the Constitution to expressly give Congress the power to deal with schools, something that the states have never done.

Justice Joseph Story had also indicated that intrastate schooling was off-limits to Congress.

"The power to regulate manufactures, not having been confided to congress, they have no more right to act upon it, than they have to interfere with the systems of education, the poor laws, or the road laws, of the states [emphases added]. Congress is empowered to lay taxes for revenue, it is true; but there is no power to encourage, protect, or meddle with manufactures." —Joseph Story, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, Commentaries on the Constitution 2

Also, consider that the only powers that the states have expressly constitutionally given the feds to protect civil rights on the basis of race is the 15th Amendment, that amendment limiting Congress to make laws protecting race only in the context of voting-related discrimination.

"15th Amendment:
Section 1: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Section 2: The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added].”

In fact, misguided President Lyndon Johnson should never have signed the constitutionally indefensible (imo) Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its titles into law because the very limited scope of the 15th and 19th Amendments.

"19th Amendment:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."

Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government desperate Democrats and RINOs home in November!

Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a "third term" in office imo.

30 posted on 08/14/2020 8:56:31 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson