Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarah Barracuda

There is only DS/CIA disinformation that he was born in Kenya. We need to keep from taking hearsay as if was solid evidence, let alone conclusive proof.

Barry’s particulars have CIA written and scrubbed throughout. His (foster) mom, “gramps,” “Toot,” fake dad, and step dad all worked for the CIA, as did his later CIA handler, John O. Brennan.

Barry’s bio mom and sperm donor were prominent 13-families material. Awaleed bin Talal, whose family was beneficiaries of ARAMCO, related to AMOCO (think Rockefeller), recognized he could do a favor for himself and Barry’s bio dad’s family at the same time by fronting money for Punaho, Occidental and Haahvud. It was working for Alwaleed until Vegas and bin Salman made his move against corruption—with PDJT’s help.

Harris didn’t have such auspicious beginnings, getting her start by working on Wiliie’s staff. But the Dems’ implicit confidence that her non-natural-born status can be overcome literally reeks of Barry’s fingerprints.


139 posted on 08/13/2020 9:26:16 PM PDT by rx (Truth will out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: rx
By rights Kamala Harris should not even be a citizen.

The founders and even most politicians up through the first three fourths of the twentieth century would be aghast at the concept of anchor babies. Anchor babies are only improperly considered a citizen at birth because of the perversion of modern courts and politicians in treating the Constitution as a “living document” so that they can interpret it however they please. This anchor baby nonsense all started with Justice William J. Brennan’s footnote in Plyler v. Doe in 1982 and was pushed into high-gear USA-destruct-mode by the evil Ted Kennedy.

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states:

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. […]

Consider the following two unassailable points.

1) The text of Section 1 clearly states that it only applies to residents of a state. Illegal invaders or other temporary alien visitors and their spawn have no legal permanent residence in any state. They are trespassing aliens or are tourists, students, etc. whose legal permanent residence is in an alien land, not one of our states.

2) The subject of Section 1 is citizenship, so when considering jurisdiction, only political jurisdiction is relevant. The political jurisdiction of alien invaders, tourists, alien students and other temporary alien visitors and any spawn they might happen to drop is their home country. That is where they vote, and where they are citizens. The fact that they are subject to local criminal jurisdiction is irrelevant to questions of citizenship.

The Wong case holding applied only to aliens with permanent resident alien parents. Harris's parents were in the USA as temporary student visitors. Also, Wong's parents were prohibited by law from becoming citizens no matter how long they resided and worked in the USA. That may narrow the holding further. Most of what you quoted was irrelevant dicta, but nice try.

140 posted on 08/13/2020 10:05:29 PM PDT by elengr (Benghazi betrayal: rescue denied - our guys DIED - treason's the reason obama s/b tried then fried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson