To Mask or Not To Mask

I have, for most of my adult life, been a practicing hypochondriac. So, it will come as no surprise to you to hear that I am a zealous reader of the Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA. I find something of interest in practically every issue. Recently, I found myself engrossed in the thoughts of Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who is also, if I am not mistaken, a noted bird watcher. I, of course, know very little about the birds. Yet, thanks to Redfield and the JAMA, I am now very much up to date in my knowledge about the wearing of masks and the controversy surrounding them during this pandemic.

You might recall that, some weeks ago, I wrote in this column about what I saw as a looming conflict between those who advocate wearing masks to protect themselves from the Wuhan virus (also known as the coronavirus) and those carefree Americanos who think that they might take their chances and go about their business maskless. Well, not surprisingly, the conflict has continued to heat up, and now it has led to full-fledged warfare, with each side taking up arms against the other and blood being spilled.

In my column, I vowed to remain "absolutely neutral" in the coming warfare between those who have advocated masks and those who would go maskless. I even offered a little joke hoping to get the contending sides to lighten up a bit. I wrote that, for the sake of public health, both the mask-wearers and the maskless should wash their hands at every opportunity and also wash their feet and blow their noses. I am told that Dr. Anthony Fauci did not think my joke was particularly funny.

I hope that he and the pulchritudinous Dr. Deborah Birx will take note of this column. I have changed my tune. I have been won over by the advocates of masks. It was Redfield and his argument in the JAMA that convinced me. He believes the pandemic can be brought under control in four to eight weeks, if "we could get everybody to wear a mask right now." In a signed editorial, he said there is "ample evidence" that masks assist in reducing transmission of the virus. Think of it! We could limit this horrible plague to a few weeks -- if we all worked together.

As things stand now, Americans are awaiting the arrival of therapeutic drugs or of vaccines, thanks to the ingenuity of our great pharmaceutical companies. I have no doubt the medications will be at hand someday soon. But Redfield says if we all wear masks, we will overcome this plague in a matter of weeks. I say, give masks a chance. (And I do hope the good doctor will not follow the example of the Washington Redskins and change the first syllable of his last name. That would be excessive.)

Even if the American pharmaceutical industry has some medications ready by the fall, it will take months, probably years, to vaccinate everyone. There will be those who refuse to take the medications because of religious scruples. There will be those who refuse them because of constitutional concerns. Probably, there will be some hypochondriacs who will dream up some dread diseases attendant with the medications. Believe me; I know about these types of kooks. And there will be the congenital ornery.

In fact, all of these uncooperative types who I have imagined as opposing future vaccinations have already appeared on the scene. They compose a large number of those who refuse to wear masks today. Actually, I was refusing to wear a mask before I read the cogent thoughts of Redfield.

Which brings me to the nub of the matter. Redfield has convinced me that if I wear a mask, we can beat this plague. Or, rather, if millions of my fellow Americans wear masks and are as reasonable as I am, we can beat this plague. But how many millions of Americans can be relied upon to follow Redfield's prescription? How many Americans are reasonable? Consider the protests in Portland, Oregon. Consider the hotheads in New York City and Washington, D.C. How about the angry young men in Chicago?

After careful consideration, I have come to the conclusion that only the giant pharmaceutical corporations will save us. Though for me, I am wearing a mask henceforth.

“Sorru, bucko, but that ain’t DATA.”

Of course not. Simple numbers of cases exploding for 6+ weeks after mask requirements were put in place upon millions of people? How can THAT compare to YOUR piercing insights.

Because, you fool, you believe a “study” that then looks at what social media is discussing. The SCIENCE was done before Trump was elected. Plenty of studies. Of course, the media and the Fauci-ists need to discredit the studies done over decades in order to fight Trump. And a study that takes a position on what “mask skeptics were sharing on social media” is no study at all, as anyone with 2 brain cells can see!

For all its faults, the WHO put out a well-documented report: “Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19” It is not worth paying attention to because the WHO put it out, but because they give the reasoning behind recommendations and the links to the studies they used.

But in terms of what happens if masks are required in public, we now KNOW the answer. Will it curb the spread? No. California has made that evident, in what is arguably one of the largest real-world experiments ever conducted.

You just don’t like admitting the truth.

"Simple numbers of cases exploding for 6+ weeks after mask requirements were put in place upon millions of people? How can THAT compare to YOUR piercing insights."

I'll explain it in simple terms so that you might possibly understand it. Over the time frame involved, TWO DIFFERENT VARIABLES CHANGED...the FLOYD-19 riots and the mask mandates. There is NO WAY to separate those variables.

And I've looked up dozens of studies, including animal studies that show that masks DO work.

The difference between you and me is that you are selling specific viewpoint (i.e. masks are bad) and I am looking at ALL THE AVAILABLE SCIENCE.

My position remains unchanged. The balance of science says that masks work.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.