If he says nothing he’ll be called raciss. If he praises him, he’ll be called raciss. If he condemns him he’ll be called raciss.
You got it.
Trump says something nice about Lewis, and it’s never enough.
Trump says something factual about Lewis (later congressional career, not his earlier activist life), then swift condemnation on Trump’s disrespect all over the sphere.
What Trump tweeted and did (flags) hit just the right tone. If he had done/said too much, then it won’t ring true.
If he says nothing hell be called raciss. If he praises him, hell be called raciss. If he condemns him hell be called raciss.
True. The way the liberals set up these situations, there is nothing you can say or do, which will make them happy.
So she’s bitching he issued a statement. Then she’s bitching that the flags at half staff were not at half staff long enough. But it sounds like she would have preferred that Trump completely ignored the passing of John Lewis. But the gesture he made is rejected as not enough.
I don’t get it.