Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

This sounds like the state’s choice. So, if a state AGREES with faithless electors, would they be allowed with the state’s complicity?


104 posted on 07/06/2020 11:47:06 AM PDT by fwdude (Pass up too many hills to die on, and youÂ’ll eventually fall in to some ocean and perish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

There were 7 faithless votes cast ... and counted by Congress. In 2016. All Legitimate and Constitutional.

This means the 4 in WASHINGTON must pay the $1000 fine.
Baca tried to be #8. In COLORADO. the state intervened and replaced him with an alternate. He sued. He lost today. His removal was Constitutional.

Different laws in different states.


109 posted on 07/06/2020 12:17:02 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson