Posted on 07/03/2020 11:38:30 PM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
Her crapipedia page reads like a campaign ad now.
No way it’s looked like that all along
It’s so blatant that it’s hysterical
Why would the Left even want to nominate Harris. The Trump campaign will definitely make an issue about her being an anchor baby.
The past is what we say it was. After we win.
Nothing else.
If the leftists want someone stupid enough to sleep with Willie Brown then there’s no helping them anyway.
Reminiscent of Winston Smith, the protagonist of Orwell’s “1984”, who spent his workdays chucking news items, etc down the memory hole in his cubicle in the Ministry of Truth, scrubbing history of anything contradicting the current party line.
They’re preparing to transform the angry Kamala into a softer, “compassionate” version who will be acceptable to a larger number of ill-informed voters.
Biden pigeonholed himself into limiting his choices for a VP to a field of candidates that is sorely lacking in qualifications other than the color of their skin. The fact that Harris is on the shortlist shows how bad his idea was.
They’re preparing to transform the angry Kamala into a softer, “compassionate” version who will be acceptable to a larger number of ill-informed voters.
*********************************************************
I don’t know that the anger will ever leave Kamala Harris. The memory of all those years where she had to go “heels up” to obtain her positions must forever grate on her soul.
I recall the Wiki founder recently bemoaning the relentless Leftwing assault on the site.
They have wanted her all along.
They were fine with Hillary sleeping with Bill to get what she wanted. The left worships power not the means.
[Some leftists take being a sleeper quite literally.]
Don't pretend you don't know. It's the not-for-profit multilingual online encyclopaedia co-founded by Jimmy Wales and supported by the Wikimedia Foundation. The English-language version of the Wiki contains nearly five million articles and has an estimated 25 million users.
Who writes the entries?
Anyone can - it's open to all and can be modified and edited by anyone. However, Wikipedia’s administrators protect some pages from direct editing if they believe they are regularly subjected to “vandalism” - the addition of abusive language or falsehoods.
Who checks for quality and accuracy?
Wikipedia is self-policing and relies on its community of volunteer editors to improve the quality and accuracy of the pages over time. It's the “wisdom of crowds” principle in action. Writers are encouraged to back up factual statements with verifiable references and authoritative sources as often as possible...
yeah they did a great job of making her sound tough on “violent” crime but with a big heart for those “non violent” crimes.
I’ve known some “non violent’ pot dealers. On was arrested with a bunch of pot, money and SHOTGUNS.
Another ALWAYS carried a gun.
Odd things for non violent drug dealers to be carrying :)
Almost every drug deal has the potential to turn violent in a second.
Even some Rs are buying into that lie.
Your indication may be a bogus depiction I’m afraid.
The second frame in which the individual to Stalin’s left had ‘unfortunately’, ‘accidentally’, ‘fallen’ into the river, was probably photographed a split second after it happened; WAY to quickly for any mortal to comprehend, even Walter Durranty !
Prepare to be disappointed. Seeing how the president himself and four out of five of his children were born to immigrant parents, I highly doubt the campaign will make this an issue.
apples and oranges.
l8r
Democrats like whores so Harris is the perfect candidate for VP.
Interesting that Wikipedia allowed some of her information on her page to be erased. However, WP built in its own manipulation program by allowing anyone to “add” to the page, which is why some much information on leftists is either Left Out (pun intended) or written in a cover-up disinformation format.
Go back in the history pages of Wikipedia about Earth Day.
As you go back in time, you will see references to Ira Einhorn gradually re-appear. As well as the laughable list of dire predictions from the 1970s
If you look at the page editors, you will see some names (aliases, of course) show up often. One that I looked at was a regular at international conferences on web content. The ad for one of the events (Rather upscale accomodations, I might add) billed it as a “friendly” event (does that mean “no arguments allowed”?)
This kind of thing is well-organized and well-funded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.