Of course, it is. There is not one dime's worth of difference between the two little globalist ghouls.
Lizie may be a tad more butch, however.
[Lizs tweet is almost word for word the same as Adam Schiff, who is also pushing the NYTimes story.]
Cheney’s hoping she can ride this to the White House, but Trump brought this upon himself by being hyper-obsequious vis-a-vis both Putin and Xi. There’s a reason both doves* and hawks have talked tough about the national leaders of the country’s adversaries, while saying that their people are innocent of those leaders’ sins. Trump has set himself up for accusations of groveling again and again. He has been tough on both China and Russia for their bids to acquire land by force. However, instead of taking credit by talking tough, he has frittered it away by appearing to be submissive and almost servile in his verbiage, as if he were a panhandler at the end of a long line of favor seekers.
* The tendency of the Democrats is to talk tough while making concessions and cutting defense spending at every turn. Slick Willy and Obama were masters at this. Trump is the reverse - he talks like a guy on their payroll when, in reality, he is putting their nuts in a vise, and ratcheting up the pressure.
[Lizs tweet is almost word for word the same as Adam Schiff, who is also pushing the NYTimes story.]
It wasn’t clear from my post, but my estimation of Cheney is that she is a bit of a Judas for bringing this up at this stage of the election cycle. I hope the next primary cycle sees her going down to defeat. I expect that is more likely if Trump loses in 2020.