Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockingham

Well, we saw a *big* move to partisanship in judges with the Clintons. Clinton-appointed judges began having regular Clinton-appointee-only meetings to discuss cases and to assign ‘sensitive’ cases amongst themselves, leaving out even other Democrat-appointed judges.

That goes even beyond the expected leanings that would result in a judicial candidate being appointed by a President with activist views.


57 posted on 06/26/2020 3:08:36 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

Too bad the non-Clinton judges did not threaten and if necessary file judicial misconduct complaints. I know of an instance some years ago in which a state supreme court justice made such a threat when such a faction developed on his court. Within days, the faction stopped their intrigues and manipulations. Of course, the threat worked because the justice who made the threat had the stones to carry it out if he had to.


58 posted on 06/26/2020 4:07:54 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson