Section 230 for the tech giants has to go.
AG Barr described in excellent fashion the background of Section 230 of the CDA, how it became a bait-and-switch vehicle for luring in members only to condone harm done as political harassment once control of the discussion arena wasestablished.
Hopefully, Rep. Nunes can keep his suit alive long enough to have this ruling appealed when Section 230 becomes repealed which it will.
Surely one can be guilty not only by a deliberate act but also by a deliberate omission. In other words, they become complicit once it can be shown they are aware of the offending account/posts and choose not to act?
But parody and memes are bannable offenses to twitter..
Does Section 230 protect FR from similar lawsuits?