Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo
Well, that may or may not be true for a "public communications company", whatever that is, but it's clearly not true for private actors like Alphabet, Facebook and Twitter.

You cannot call them "private actors" if their business requires Public participation.

I'll tell you what let's do. Let's ban the public from using their restricted speech system, and let them operate as a "private" club where they can censor any one of their members that they like. How about that?

It's trivially easy to find case law upholding this principle.

It is trivially easy to find case law to support abortion and homosexuality, but anyone with real knowledge of our history knows these rulings are utter bullsh*t made up by phony baloney activist judges with an agenda.

I have absolutely no respect for "case law" decided by liberal judges who have no actual respect or even understanding for the laws they are trampling down to enact their agenda.

And neither should you.

You want to take away the first amendment rights of the techs because you think they discriminate against your viewpoint. Unfortunately for you that's not how the Constitution works.

It's amusing that you think "how the constitution works" has a d@mn thing to do with how Federal court decisions get shoved down the nation's throats. Most conservatives are well aware of all the federal court abuses over the years, and they generally express contempt for the liberal judiciary and their lying decisions.

Homosexual marriage? Where is that in Constitutional law? We used to lock up those sick perverts in mental institutions, and this was the normal solution to them for a couple of hundred years in this country.

Don't lecture me on Federal Court crap decisions. As I said, most conservatives are well aware the federal courts have long been filled with lying Liberal judges who make up law as they go along.

Mostly this was caused by Roosevelt.

39 posted on 05/30/2020 11:02:10 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Don't lecture me on Federal Court crap decisions.

If we don't have the courts to adjudicate legal disputes all we have is each other giving our opinions, which may amuse us but is otherwise inconsequential..

You toss words like conservative around and then reject the rule of law.

I don't agree with every legal decision but do consider them useful to help order our society.

40 posted on 05/30/2020 11:48:40 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson