[romanesq]

I already predicted the June 1st date for the Appeals Court to handle the next aspect toward dismissal.

You’re too late.

Plenty of people say they predicted dismissal but I did it here and elsewhere last year.

So my prediction is not only on the record but correct back to 2019 long before you tried to duplicate me here and make some ridiculous non-argument when I’ve already stated on the record my full and complete prediction.

I’ve stated it will be sooner than later. You have not countered with any date. If you dare Hostage, I will follow your prediction and beat you once again!

So try me.

[Hostage]

I see. You’re predicting June 1 the appellate court will handle ‘something”.

I suppose you think they are not going to read Wilkinson’s response for Sullivan, just wave their hands and say Sullivan sucks.

Uh-huh.

You’ve got nothing of value to add here other than you’re a narcissistic A—h——.

> “I’ve stated it will be ***sooner than later***. You have not countered with any date. If you dare Hostage, I will follow your prediction and beat you once again!”

What a frickin load of bleep.

I predicted when the appellate court ORDERED Sullivan to address his actions in light of the Fokker case, I predicted Sullivan would dismiss and not bother to respond. I was wrong.

So there’s already been a delay because the Obama-Hillary mafia decided Sullivan’s getting a well-connected DC lawyer to write his response to the appeals court. And the question I have on this thread and others is how long will be the delay. I have received info from lawyers that is quite useful.

The question is how much more delay is possible. Your BS answer is ***sooner than later***. My dog could predict that.

Get lost!