> “But the Appeals Court has aggressively responded in rare fashion to the writ.”
Attorney Sydney Powell has said in her interviews that the DC Appeals Court did NOT respond DIRECTLY to her motion for Writ of Mandamus. She made it clear the appellate court was not ordering him to respond to the Writ motion, it was ordering him to respond to what he was doing especially in regards to the Fokker case.
In effect, the appellate court is ordering Sullivan to show his cards, strongly suggesting he dismiss the case and render the Writ motion moot.
> “I’ve been correct on this for two years and I will be correct again.”
That statement is so lame that I am sure any attorney scanning it over will decide the level of the thread is not worth their time.
Again, you are not learning what the issue is.
People on this thread including me read the same and more than you. All the information you have, I have and then some.
Because you refuse to get it, answer what happens AFTER the response to the order is filed on June 1. You don’t have the knowledge and experience to answer informatively.
And don’t say the appellate panel will come down hard on Sullivan yada, yada, yada, etc.
There are legal procedures that must be followed after June 1 and those procedures can be exploited for delay. Attorney Powell will certainly be prepped and ready to staunch those delays but she can’t change court rules if such rules allow delays. For example, the appellate court will need to extend per procedure a separate response to the motion for Writ of Mandamus. Then there will be a reply. There may be a motion by the Sullivan side to be heard before the full en banc appeals panel, not just a 3-judge panel and that can cause time to assemble causing more delay.
That’s what you’re not getting and the reason you don’t get it is because you are not a lawyer with knowledge and experience yet you think you can bully a thread with your view because you think you know best when it is obvious to any legal mind you don’t know much.
> “General Flynn will soon be exonerated and dismissed from this persecution.”
My posting history shows I believed in General Flynn and supported his side before most on FR. When many FR participants were saying he was a Democrat who lied and made mistakes, I was posting his party affiliation was irrelevant, his patriotism was more important, and his plea was coerced. I was posting this last year and it just came out this year it was true.
And now he should be freed but Sullivan is holding him hostage because Sullivan is controlled by the Obama-Hillary faction. This faction has now got Sullivan a lawyer and will be responding to the appellate order rather than letting Sullivan dismiss the case.
And the question is why? Why are they maneuvering to cause delay? They will respond to the order on June 1 but then they will cause the appellate court to set schedule on the motion for Writ of Mandamus and that will cause delay. It doesn’t matter how aggressive the 3-judge appellate panel is against Sullivan because certain court rules must be followed and those rules require days of notice, days of response, days for reply and there can be intervening motions in the interim.
Hopefully, if you bothered to read the above, you will start to be aware of what the discussion is about.
I am well read on the case and know it better than you. Which is why my prediction will again be proven correct.
You are wrong.
The Appeals Court responded very aggressively to Judge Sullivan’s ridiculous action against General Flynn in his refusal to remove his fingers from around General Flynn’s neck.
I am well informed and know full well the Appeals Court did not take well to Sullivan’s briefing scheduling opening up an amicus briefing schedule.
You just can’t handle that I’m going to be right again. It bothers you but I don’t care.
General Flynn follows me on Twitter. No one cares about what you think and inability to recognize the June 1 Appeals Court deadline to Judge Sullivan.
You’ve insisted this is all about delay and I’ve insisted it’s all about the pending victory for General Flynn.
So, I’m quite confident I will be correct here once more.