Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL

“What’s the point of this publication if they’re not going to bother with peer review?”

As I have pointed out before, these days peer review is mostly for political correctness, not scientific accuracy or correct methodology. And the political correctness of anti-Trump propaganda is self evident. Numerous hoax papers have made it through the peer review process to publication. As have plenty of junk science papers that were intended to be serious.


753 posted on 06/04/2020 3:02:42 PM PDT by calenel (Don't panic. Prepare and be vigilant. Join the war effort. On the human side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies ]


To: calenel
As I have pointed out before, these days peer review is mostly for political correctness, not scientific accuracy or correct methodology.

Apparently, not providing access to data and models has become the norm in scientific papers over the past 2 decades. Look to climate science as the worst offender.

754 posted on 06/04/2020 3:27:18 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson