Replies

I think you might be partially correct @ post 14.

Downer’s alleged statements about what occurred did not match the FISA attribution or the testimony - certainly not the Woods file since they did not really even bother with it. I think some people were writing fiction that was attributed to Downer, Halper, Mifsud, and/or Steele. Uh oh.

We are still missing more pieces than we have on the table, but the pace is picking up quickly. There is a record of just about everything involved in this case just waiting to be found. I think they even have more text messages between the lovebirds that have not yet been released that may further connect the dots.

I think you do have it correct above and named the right person - they (the lovebirds) fudged the call because they could knowing only a select group had access to it. They abandoned all pretense of fairness, ethics, and justice to achieve a desired result.

How do we know this?

Because there are too many players (previously pretty silent) who are pushing stories to the media and in interviews trying to get ahead of something..... Comey has gone silent as the designated fall guy..... and out of the blue, Wray declares there will be an internal investigation. Barr makes his most damning statement yet publicly. Trump all of a sudden tweets #Obamagate.

The coup plotters are confused and the finger pointing is beginning.

The leak of the Flynn call transcript you reference above is believed to have come from Baker at the Pentagon - Office of Net Assessment. There have been some stories out there and I think Sidney Powell has said this in interviews. He had a very cozy relationship with David Ignasius (sp?) the reporter who broke the story. The question becomes who asked him to do this? He does not strike me as that brazen, but maybe he was. I don’t have much of a read on him.

If it were not him that it is likely the FBI summary of the call is different than the received product and that means whomever altered it prior to leaking it will be discovered as only a few had it.

Wray will try to drag out his internal review until after November, but this thing is picking up speed and honestly he has very little control over it. I think Wray knows there are some big hits coming and they cannot delay the inevitable so he is trying to take a more defensible position.

The real movers in this are Jensen and Durham. Jensen was former FBI and knows the bureau so I suspect he is handling more of that. Durham (previously investigated the intel community) is likely on to bigger fish and I think Lee Smith’s article from a couple of days ago is the closest glimpse we have had to the big picture and it explains why all of a sudden we are seeing Rice grant interviews, the democrats in the know going silent or requesting transcripts to be released (Schiff for transparency?), and Obama himself throwing jabs at Trump.

Change is in the air isn’t it?

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/russiagate-obama-iran

This is a long read, but it is worth it. A great piece that connects the dots all the way to the oval office.

Trump keeps his promises and when he tweeted #Obamagate it indicated that he has either learned something concrete that will soon be released or he has instinctively put it all together much as Lee Smith did in this article.

He claimed he was wiretapped and the left howled with outrage - he was right.

He called it all a nasty and vicious hoax and the left and republicrats screamed and howled - he was right.

Now he has labeled it #Obamagate. They predictably howled and all of a sudden Obama starts making public statements again.....

He will be right again.

Now we have to wonder what Comey will do..... everyone is pointing the finger at him - his subordinates to include McCabe, his peers (Brennan and Clapper), and his “boss” at the White House (see Rice’s last email for the record). However, as someone said above he kept copious memos and knows a lot of dirt.