Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

The Taiwan Relations Act


177 posted on 05/26/2020 7:31:09 AM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: All

Correct - there is no formal “obligation” to defend Taiwan.

Nixon and Kissinger were pretty sure we’d have open access to Chinese markets and were prepared to sell out Taiwan.

However, the language in the TRA 1979 is seen as strategically ambiguous, but the bottom line is near obligatory as you are going to get.

“The act further stipulates that the United States will “consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States”.

Diplomatically, “grave concern” is used as a use of force option.


178 posted on 05/26/2020 8:10:19 AM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

To: rbmillerjr

The Taiwan Relations Act is not a treaty, and it does not promise defense.

You know as well as I do that a mutual defense treaty with Taiwan, if one were signed, could not be ratified by this or any conceivable Senate.


179 posted on 05/26/2020 8:30:28 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Think like youÂ’re right, listen like youÂ’re wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson