I was amused by the fact that Powell noted that Sullivan had already denied such efforts to intervene on multiple occasions.
...But, hey, for old friends, just this once, I could exercise my judicial discretion to make an exception and allow some political grandstanding. After all, if at the end of the day I dismiss, what difference does it make?
24 times, plus amicus is unheard of in criminal TRIAL cases.
Judge is out to lunch, and he knows it. He’s counting on the public not knowing it, the same way the public fell for SC lie and ICIG whistleblower lie. Totally outside the rule of law, but hey, wave arms and say if you oppose you are against the rule of law, and voila, people fall for it.
Amusing, yes, and amazing too.