But based on an investigation of the known facts by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. If the local authorities have admitted that they can't conduct an impartial investigation - and two recused themselves for that very reason - then isn't an investigation by an impartial third party something we should be applauding?
The shooter and his father will get an open trial where they will be able to submit evidence of their innocence and the prosecutor will present evidence of their guilt. A jury of their peers will decide. That's how it should have been all along. Fortunately that's how it will be going forward.
Speaking of the Trayvon Martin incident - are you still sore the jury didn't have the same knee-jerk reaction as you did?
Apparently not as sore as you are that the state overruled the knee-jerk reaction of the local authorities and conducted an actual investigation that lead to charges being filed.
Is this a reference to the Trayvon Martin incident, or the Georgia incident?
The reason I asked if that was a reference to the Trayvon Martin incident is because you tied the post directly to a question I had posted mentioning TMs name.
And because the disgraced lawyer Benjamin Crump represents the families of both of the deceased youths.
As I recall, you were completely, but unwittingly, duped by Mr. Crump in the Trayvon Martin incident. Take care he does not do it to you again in the Georgia incident.