Gore: We Are in ‘Grave Danger’ — Trump Is ‘Recklessly Rolling the Dice’ in Attempt to Win Reelection

Breitbart.com ^ | 5/7/2020 | Pam Key

[Obadiah]

You said we are in danger.

I said, “grave danger?”

You said, “is there another kind?”

[Ratman0823]

Didn’t he use to be somebody? Oh, yeah, he was Tommy Lee Jones’ roommate at Harvard.

[rfp1234]

Which alter ego is he using today, Crazed Sex Poodle or ManBearPig?

[Redwood71]

During the Clinton Gore administration where he talks about a daily lengthy report from the intelligence committee and how hey reacted like a stampede to any threat. Flu deaths were not handled in the same way as they are at this time, (shut down), and the numbers of death were not recorded in better than guesses then as it appears they didn't consider the flu deaths a threat. Year Deaths 1993-4 7,429 1994-5 6,667 1995-6 4,941 1996-7 9,673 1997-8 9,393 1998-9 9,695 1999-00 10,594 That adds up to 58,492 deaths during the Clinton/Gore years that they didn't think was enough to consider worrying about or harming the economy for. Seems kind of disingenuous on his part to worry about reacting now, doesn't it? rwood

[JPG]

GO AWAY! SCAT! GET LOST! VAMOOSE! BEAT IT! HIT THE BRICKS!

[cp124]

He snuffed out Tipper to lower his carbon footprint.

[chuckles]

If you don't think Democrats have a debased mind, then you aren't paying attention. Read Romans 1 again carefully paying strict attention to the homosexual part.

If Climate change models are 100% wrong and they change the dates and they are 100% wrong, why would I believe the virus models would even be 10% right? Then they change the numbers by a factor of 100, and they prove wrong. I believe an educated guess by Trump has more value than the so called "scientists". 70 % 0f the whole world is using HCQ to treat their sick and half say it works and the other half says it kills people. I wonder if the Lupus patients know they are really dead after taking this poison for decades? How many soldiers truly died after taking Quinine before going to duty in a Malaria country? Science depends on data. How can so many interpret data wrong? It has to do with an agenda rather than data. If you look at the data on global warming it says we are basically flat for the last 10 years. The Ozone hole got bigger 30 years after R12 was banned. Could it be that Dupont wanted a new patent for 134A and convinced Congress to support them? Is John Lott's data on guns right, or is Nancy Pelosi right?