Why is the treatment controvertial if so many countries are using it”
“Why is the treatment controversial if so many countries are using it(?)”
Gilead (big pharma)
Because Trump mentioned it a few times, and somebody drank some fish-tank cleaner, and because a fake study yielded fake results saying to doesn’t work and kills people, and the scientific studies have either just finished or are still in progress. So until then it’s anecdotal. And because Orange Man Bad.
My question exactly! It was made "controversial" by the media only because Trump mentioned it as possibly being of help in Coronavirus. The media made it controversial --- it is NOT controversial.
It is apparent from the tone of the article that the author is a progressive lib and probably from the deep part of the swamp.
But the real question is: Why is searching the doctor’s emails any different than tracking General Flynn?
I know the legal difference, so don’t bother with getting off on that tangent.
I am questioning the ethics of the government scanning a person’s personal email for something with which to charge him when the person has not committed a crime by expressing a professional opinion.
Or are we now to the point that stating a professional opinion can be labeled a crime?
The jury is not out and theres no way that they can deny this is 80-year-old medicine that has been used on millions of patience for lupus and malaria
All were seeing is the media is typical bull crap which is whatever Trump says were going to say the opposite
In this case hilariously this is means that the media and the Democrats have had to take the side of the virus
And of course the communist Chinese
[[Why is the treatment controvertial if so many countries are using it]]
Because here in the states- ‘orange man bad’ and the left want ot crash this economy because they think they can run and win in Nov with a crashed economy- that is all they have left to run on- their false promises of ‘fixing the nation’