Posted on 04/17/2020 9:31:21 AM PDT by Aquamarine
“so sorry”
It wasn’t an act of God - more like an act of mad scientists who were apparently funded in part by the US Congress from the money provided by the unknowing US taxpayer.
Nuke em
They need to settle down. No one’s going to war with our great great friend Xi.
Interesting. I think a clause like this is somewhat normal for an agreement this large and we would have wanted it also though.
While I am suspicious about China and always assign an ulterior and nefarious motive to their actions, I will reserve judgment until there is more information as something like this was likely in the first proposed draft long before the pandemic. If it was a last minute addition Robert Lighthizer will tell us as he worked on every part of this deal for years.
bttt
It’s an act of war. But no one is going to war because you probably couldn’t field any large scale army or keep a navy afloat for long. What we can do is turn the world against China. We just have to keep digging.
I think this pandemic may have been intentional. It didn’t make any sense to me that it was intentional until now and given that China has filed a patent for Remdesivir. This pandemic is all about money. Introduce a pandemic and profit off the cure.
The entire world needs to disengage from China economically.
We are making them rich and they are using that wealth to build their military to take over the world.
This provides a perfectly good reason to cut them off from civilized nations.
Tiananmen was another one but GHW Bush decided otherwise.
She may be an economist but she isn’t a lawyer. Any decent contract of this complexity will have a force majeure clause. And just because one side invokes it doesn’t mean the other side has to automatically agree.
I believe her.
Great body of evidence.
May I lend a hand?
Everyone in the Pentagon knows that China is AT WAR with the United States: Cyber, Diplomatic, Informational, Economic, and Military. They continually operate at a level just below provoking kinetic response.
“War is the continuation of politics by other means.” -Carl von Clausewitz
“It is the pinnacle of victory to win without fighting” -Sun Tzu
“But no one is going to war because you probably couldn’t field any large scale army or keep a navy afloat for long. What we can do is turn the world against China. We just have to keep digging.”
It’s an asymmetric war. There are many ways to conduct warfare without telegraphing your punch.
Yes. We should ban Chinese students from US universities, bring our manufacturing back to our shores, and impose extremely high tariffs and everything sold to China or purchased from China.
This should NOT be about diplomacy or about changing hearts and minds. I would not hope for the Xi government to "get better". I wouldn't trust them. We should be trying to destroy the Chinese economy in hopes of a collapse of the government.
It is state-level criminal negligence.
Whether it is an act of war would depend on a review of the evidence and timeline.
That said, we’re already at war whether we want to admit or on not.
That's the kind of thing the President would know but wouldn't tell the rest of us.
That said, it does look like this virus was reverse engineered by the Chinese from something in a lab (like SARS). It has been alleged by Western scientists in China that this virus could not have made the jump from animals to humans with its genome intact (i.e., the genome in the human virus identical to that in the animal from which it is said to have come). The very fact that the virus has a 100% identical genome to the one in the animal from which was supposed to have come means that it was reverse engineered in that Wuhan lab for the very purpose of infecting humans.
Here's the link to an excellent video that discusses this virus comparison study (link starts at the 9:28 minute mark).
Whatever she’s selling, have supply order two dozen of each!
Trade deal out clause - Now that is something I did not think of. I could not understand why China would want to blow the economy of their #1 customer
That photograph pretty much proves she is an excellent economist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.