Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chewbarkah
Jarrett would be more credible since she has experience pulling Obama’s strings.

It won't be Jarrett for that very reason. Jill does the string pulling around the Biden house.

And along that line, I don't think Jill or Biden's handlers will let him pick any woman that will threaten him, over-shadow him, or try to overthrow him (and that would rule Abrams out. She's threatens everyone and everything. She's a beast.).

55 posted on 04/16/2020 4:07:06 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: RoosterRedux

Hey, liar squaw...NO ONE wants you to be VP. Go back to your teepee, you ignorant slut.


56 posted on 04/16/2020 6:42:52 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

I threw Jarrett in as a joke; she’d never run for elected office. You opened up another dimension of Joe’s dilemma. Biden’s closest handlers will not tolerate a running mate who is ready to be POTUS on day one, yet that is what the voters will require.

I think the Dems expect to lose, making his VP pick a “burner”, useful only for drawing minority voters to help their down-ticket races. Stacy Abrams might motivate black voters, and she would enjoy the exposure even in a defeat. She is radical enough to please some Bernistas, and is utterly shameless. Your Jill Biden angle might knock her out of contention, otherwise she’s their best hope of losing successfully.


58 posted on 04/16/2020 7:40:59 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson