What we need is a scientific comparison of Abbott’s machines with the standard slower methods of testing to determine which ones are more accurate.
As it stands now, we can’t make head or tail of how correct the assessment of this person you trust is without being presented with any reliable data.
there’s is absolutely no doubt that pcr is the gold standard in virology testing.
and your suggested method is the best way to validate new tests, imo.
look, i can at least suggest, although i hate it when others do this to me, that you can go take a close look at the company. what and how have they been doing lately in bringing up new testing. we’re talking about a very big co here.
well, i’m going to shut up now. again this is basically one data point in time. i could be wrong. i hope i am.