Color me skeptical. Somebody went wild with a correlation of de-identified patient data on respiratory infections.
When they identify an area that is almost all wildlife refuge down in the river bottom as high risk their credibility is lost to me.
I’m calling bull shit on this one.
I suspect gooberment waste.
There are a LOT of rank amateur "data scientists" out there who don't know which end of the hammer to pick up. I suspect one of these hobbyist types is at work here.