Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: karpov

I am in favor of reducing the risks of transmitting or catching the virus especially among those most vulnerable. But is there really such a thing as “nonessential economy”? Why isn’t a middle ground based on true risk assessment and reasonable easily achieved mitigation of risks not being taken seriously? Perhaps some businesses would have to remain closed and RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR DOING SO. But I think the majority of businesses could make adjustments that would allow them to remain open. Perhaps with a limited staff and occupancy and a change of hours. Maybe by restricting the handling of merchandise. I don’t know. I do know the all or nothing approach is not working.


45 posted on 03/25/2020 8:03:16 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lastchance

Because everyone who in the past has been “essential” due to hurricanes or snow storms already knows who they are.


49 posted on 03/25/2020 8:20:51 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson