Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

One aspect of all of this that is going totally unremarked is we are foolishly (IMHO) throwing decades of principles and rationale for medical testing to the winds. 40 years ago “Screening normal people” for disease ushered in a new era that brought with it poorly or completely unanticipated effects that we are still dealing with after decades. AFAIK mass medical testing of large masses of humanity for the indication of “I want a test” has never been done and if past performance is a predictor I would guess we will be dealing with the fallout from this for decades.


3 posted on 03/16/2020 4:36:43 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute

Well, I’m no epidemiologist (nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night), but for assessing the spread of a novel virus into a population, widespread testing might not be a bad idea...?


8 posted on 03/16/2020 4:41:06 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

And we’re talking quick test, not serology?


9 posted on 03/16/2020 4:42:42 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

It’s not “screening normal people” or whoever says “I want a test”. It’s aimed at screening only people with symptoms.

The press briefings are very good and show a very good plan.


25 posted on 03/16/2020 5:39:38 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson