Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaxxonWoods

SCIENCE Magazine says this:

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-novel-virus-spreading-globally

So if it’s not bats, what is it?

Wuhan is the location of a bioweapon facility close to the market where the virus is said to have originated.

I draw my own conclusions based on the facts presented.

Now, on what basis do you reject my hypothesis?


27 posted on 02/28/2020 8:15:23 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: TigerClaws

I didn’t reject anything. I asked what your expertise is in this area.

You have none.


37 posted on 02/28/2020 8:20:37 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Epstein pulled a Carradine, the bozo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

What I tend to believe, and I have only anecdotal evidence to support this, is the following:

China, like probably all of the first-world countries on earth, play with diseases like this to prepare for a day where something like this is used against them. Any bioweapon has to have an offensive and defensive component.

The ‘sword’ is the infecting agent. The ‘shield’ is the vaccine or cure used to protect your strategic interests.

Culture is a factor here, and I believe that lab workers charged with disposing of test subjects may have sold them instead, for whatever reason.

China can’t exactly come forward and admit this, and the ‘wet market’ initial story was a plausible enough cover in that it the animals may have been sold there, and that was the index element of the spread.

Once scientists got a look at the virus and fully sequenced it, it likely became apparent that CV-19 came from a lab.

Had this been an intentional act by China, I doubt they would have initiated the attack a few miles from the facility it came from. I would have done it closer to a US facility that did the same research.

China had a zoo for tiny beasts, and one got out in or on an actual beast.

That makes more sense to me.

If China had the ‘shield’ component, they’d have used it by now. Why take a trillion dollar hit to your economy so close to signing an economic deal that was already going to cost you in several ways?

Coup against Xi? Maybe, but why would you do this when there’s a risk one of your own family could end up being collateral damage.

Anyway, simple tends to be more likely, and this fits the information (such that it is) at the moment, FOR ME.

Interested to hear anyone’s thoughts on this theory.


102 posted on 02/28/2020 8:53:26 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

They reject anything that disturbs their fantasy that COVID19 is not just another seasonal flu. They firmly believe it is a hoax aimed at DJT. Its a waste of time to deal with these COVID19 trolls; they are on al the COVID19 threads insisting that everyone supply the with links documentation sources and so on and then finding fault with them while placing implicit trust in the CCP numbers ... go figure.


129 posted on 02/28/2020 9:11:01 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson