The Old Media Presses Facebook to the Left

The "news" media routinely exhibit a badly disguised loathing for social media. Journalists calling themselves "mainstream" expect social media platforms to bend to their liberal talking points. Any rogue information that doesn't match the liberal narrative must be flagged and demonized as "misinformation."

The Washington Post published a 4,100-word attack on Facebook. Tech reporter Craig Timberg trashed Facebook as "a platform that gives politicians license to lie and that remains awash in misinformation, vulnerable to a repeat of many of the problems that marred the 2016 presidential election." Timberg found anonymous sources to summarize Facebook's relationship with Republicans. A former employee said: "This is what they know about Republicans: Tell them 'yes' or they will hurt us."

That's not what conservatives are finding. Tom Elliott of Grabien posted a video on Facebook of Sen. Bernie Sanders at a rally in El Paso, Texas. He found the video flagged with a note saying, "False information: Checked by independent fact-checkers." His headline was interpretive. "Sanders: Illegal Immigrants Are 'Entitled' to the Same Government Benefits as Citizens."

Here's what Sanders said at the rally. You decide whether Elliott's headline is false.

He began saying: "Today, we got 500,000 people sleeping out on the streets of America. Today, we have 18 million families paying 50% of their limited incomes for housing. Today, we have hundreds of thousands of bright young people who cannot afford to get a higher education. Today, we have 45 million people paying a student debt that many of them cannot afford to pay."

Then Sanders took this litany of unmet needs and wrapped them in the language of rights. "So what our campaign is about, and what our administration will be about, is rethinking America, understanding that all of our people -- and when I say all, I also mean the undocumented in this country -- that all of our people are entitled to basic human rights."

It's not a stretch to tie these points together. He's saying that "basic human rights" include the right to housing and the right to a free university education -- and that the "undocumented" are also entitled to these "rights."

But Facebook allowed a website called Lead Stories and an article in the site's "Hoax Alert" section to rule these claims as false. The Lead Stories headline was "Bernie Sanders Did NOT Say Undocumented 'Entitled' to Same Government Benefits As U.S. Citizens." Who are these people? The "resident expert on fake news" is co-founder Maarten Schenk, who works from home ... in Belgium. (In other words, he's "foreign election interference.") Schenk told the BBC: "I see my job as a fact checker. My job is not to give an opinion about it."

Balderdash. This was the "Hoax Alert" take, written by Chelsea Carter: "Basic human rights, as defined by the United Nations ... include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more." The bottom line? Sanders' "saying entitled to basic human rights does not mean the same thing as 'entitled to government benefits.'"

But it's right there on the Sanders campaign website. "Sanders Calls For 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights," reads a headline. It's all listed there; every American is "entitled to ... The right to a decent job that pays a living wage ... The right to quality health care ... The right to a complete education ... The right to affordable housing." This is not fact-checking. It's a refusal to admit Sanders' actual positions because they don't like the way the positions sound in headlines.

This is not a debate between information and misinformation. It's a debate between the socialist definition of human rights and the conservative definition. Facebook should allow this video to be shown without this phony "fact-check" block. Let a free debate blossom.

The Left blamed social media for defeating Hillary, so this year, they are trying to block any conservatives on social media, and the Leftists who own these platforms, are happy to help them. That’s why conservatives should dump Facebook and the rest of the Left and get their own platform.

I disabled the Facebook app on my phone a couple of years ago. The ‘out of sight, out of mind” meme applied. I’ve logged in on my desctop computer roughly once every few months since then.

I wonder if my old myspace account still works. :)

“. . . a platform that gives politicians license to lie and that remains awash in misinformation . . ..”

This, from the Washington Post without an irony warning.

Anyone with half a brain knows that the old saying "Don't believe everything you read." applies - in spades. If that hadn't been an axiom before the internet, it certainly would have become one. Within limits (regarding certain illegal activities) people can, and do, say/publish/promote anything and everything on the internet. You don't know their motives, or what they do for kicks. People can adopt whatever persona, whatever beliefs they want.

So the upshot is, when you find "news" or information on the internet you really do have to "take it with a grain of salt" because you don't really know what that source is all about. The difference between random internet sites and the MSM media is simple. On the internet, anything goes, they could be promoting any agenda. From the MSM, you know they're promoting a leftist agenda. Simple as that.

That’s why conservatives should dump Facebook and the rest of the Left and get their own platform.

Which will abandon all of those in the mushy middle to hear only the Left's side of the story. Precisely what they're going for.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.