Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NativeSon
There is a large amount of domestic manufacturing, including packaging, that is used in development. When product goes to production for market (not pre-market production) alternate supply chains are qualified to reduce costs.

The manufacturing sites and the supply chains are already qualified, the processes validated.

Yes, but do those manufacturing sites and the supply chains keep on making the newly developed product, and for how long? Or do they go on to the next product to develop once the cheaper suppliers are up to speed?

What I'm getting at is how much production capacity really exists in the US, and how fast can additional production lines be themselves produced? Maybe it's different in Big Pharma, but my experience in "modest" manufacturing (mostly 100 to 300 employee plants) is that creating new production lines, esp. if a new or renovated-to-purpose building is required, is not exactly snap-your-fingers stuff. WW2 timelines would be disastrous for millions of our meds-dependent population.

69 posted on 02/15/2020 10:07:09 PM PST by Paul R. (The Lib / Socialist goal: Total control of nothing left wort h controlling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Paul R.

There were about fifty production facilities in Puerto Rico before the hurricane. Some prior movement of pharmaceuticals to other locations was due to a change in the tax code, which raised costs on the manufacturing operations.

The recent reveal of the extent of political corruption on the island, provides an additional inkling of the conditions under which these businesses endured a “squeeze.” Galt in action under the Wesley Mouch influence.


84 posted on 02/16/2020 9:52:17 AM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson