“The black ledger was widely reported to be fake in mid-2019, so this is not new info.”
I believe you’re missing the point. The significant fact is not that the report was “widely reported to be fake”. What’s momentous is that the Mueller team new this as early as the Spring of 2018.
Mueller knew it earlier than that, imo.
For example, Ukraines top anticorruption prosecutor, Nazar Kholodnytsky, told me he warned the U.S. State Departments law enforcement liaison and multiple FBI agents in late summer 2016 that Ukrainian authorities who recovered the ledger believed it likely was a fraud.
It was not to be considered a document of Manafort. It was not authenticated. And at that time it should not be used in any way to bring accusations against anybody, Kholodnytsky said, recalling what he told FBI agents.
Likewise, Manaforts Ukrainian business partner Konstantin Kilimnik, a regular informer for the State Department, told the U.S. government almost immediately after The New York Times wrote about the ledger in August 2016 that the document probably was fake.
Manafort could not have possibly taken large amounts of cash across three borders. It was always a different arrangement payments were in wire transfers to his companies, which is not a violation, Kilimnik wrote in an email to a senior U.S. official on Aug. 22, 2016.
He added: I have some questions about this black cash stuff, because those published records do not make sense. The timeframe doesnt match anything related to payments made to Manafort. It does not match my records. All fees Manafort got were wires, not cash.
Special counsel Robert Muellers team and the FBI were given copies of Kilimniks warning, according to three sources familiar with the documents.