Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: karpov

So basically he kept the deals of the contract, but now government wants to come dpwn on him since those conditions no longer are in force.


11 posted on 02/05/2020 3:20:05 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

In the 1960s, in order to encourage low-income rental buildings, Congress gave some sorts of incentives to property owners that would expire in ~20 years, after which, the properties would be free to go to market rates.

As the expiration of those incentive agreements was drawing nigh, at the behest of then-congresscritter Joe Kennedy, Congress pulled some similar-but-not-theft stunt.


23 posted on 02/05/2020 4:09:05 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

It’s simply quite shocking that politicians even talk like this. The arrogance of it is just flabbergasting. Hey, if they really want to keep 52 units $1000 cheaper, write the landlord a check for $52,000 each month. Adjust it for market rates when appropriate.

And I know, that’s also crazy - but they already kicked in $5.4 million or whatever to finance its construction.


25 posted on 02/05/2020 4:42:14 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson