Good argument for constitutional carry.
Sheriff needs to ask as many legal “experts” as he can about this issue and then take the average of the responses. /semi-sarc
Note that Section 1 of the 14th Amendment indicates the very real possibility of unconstitutional state laws.
”14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
I'm deeply disturbed that young Audrey isn't dancing the Spandau Ballet on the nearest handy tree or lamppost...
I'm deeply disturbed that young Audrey isn't dancing the Spandau Ballet on the nearest handy tree or lamppost...
Sounds like the SF Chronicle needs to be sued.
” As a result, they have put our journalists in personal danger for their own political gain,”
No, you did that, you dumbass!
Target identification for harassment, doxing, red flagging, and confiscation...
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
As one of those who’s personal information was disclosed I cannot begin to adequately express my outrage that a major newspaper from a extremely liberal city like San Francisco 100 miles away (who has abdicated it’s responsibility to protect it’s own citizens) has seen fit to obtain my information in perhaps the most conservative city in California without giving any reason for having done so. What’s next? In an attempt to publicly shame gun owner/carriers our information will be released resulting in criminals burglarizing our homes endangering us and our families. All of this by those ever vigilant in the protections of the First Amendment at the expense of we who cherish all of the Amendments.
As one of those who’s personal information was disclosed I cannot begin to adequately express my outrage that a major newspaper from a extremely liberal city like San Francisco 100 miles away (who has abdicated it’s responsibility to protect it’s own citizens) has seen fit to obtain my information in perhaps the most conservative city in California without giving any reason for having done so. What’s next? In an attempt to publicly shame gun owner/carriers our information will be released resulting in criminals burglarizing our homes endangering us and our families. All of this by those ever vigilant in the protections of the First Amendment at the expense of we who cherish all of the Amendments.
As one of those who’s personal information was disclosed I cannot begin to adequately express my outrage that a major newspaper from a extremely liberal city like San Francisco 100 miles away (who has abdicated it’s responsibility to protect it’s own citizens) has seen fit to obtain my information in perhaps the most conservative city in California without giving any reason for having done so. What’s next? In an attempt to publicly shame gun owner/carriers our information will be released resulting in criminals burglarizing our homes endangering us and our families. All of this by those ever vigilant in the protections of the First Amendment at the expense of we who cherish all of the Amendments.
Is the public entitled to know which books I read? Which church I attend? My medical records? How I voted?
The Supreme Court is woefully behind in its work to free us from this tyranny. They need to get moving.
The Sheriff should, while giving the paper the names and information on concealed carry holders, give out the address of the Chronicle’s editor who did this, and suggest that subscribers and readers send her some mail with their opinions.
If the worm turns, get a bigger worm.
That also is "public information," Miss Snip. It's been used to doxx others. Private citizens have no reason to trust the good intentions of liberal big city papers...I guess you're not as 'respected' as you think.
just say no
is the sheriff elected or appointed? hm