Posted on 01/30/2020 9:15:53 AM PST by Jim Robinson
No, he is just picking on Rand Paul, once yesterday and once today.
Lard@ss is repeating his pig-squeal melodramatic accusations AGAIN. “Trump thinks he’s a monarch, Trump is a dictator”, blah blah blah.
Lard@ss knows he’s losing. Everything having to do with the President’s Constitutional rights is “NONSENSE.”
This fat turd is now slandering Professor Dershowitz, as if Dersh has a third grade education. This, from an obese dull normal slob who went to a nameless cheesey night law school and then went immediately into politics.
SPIT
Senator from Georgia just asked President’s counsel about “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree”
Because they know he’ll be acquitted they are speaking as they do now since they will undoubtedly continue these analogies and twisted remarks after the trial. Repetition is their game.....keep the lights on Trump now and hereafter to avoid the criminal corruption of the deep state and all their cohorts including the press....who are also involved in their corruption.
House classified so it wouldn’t be allowed as evidence for impeachment.
They can keep repeating and our President just keeps on getting stronger.
They keep asking the same stupid questions just rearranging the words.
Isn’t that the definition of insanity?
Crow spinning his web again. ....can’t believe people by his tripe.
Because the Dems operate by repetition.
Yep, I guess that tells us both the democrat senators and House managers are insane.
Straight out of Alinsky, lie, lie, and lie until it becomes the truth.
I get the feeling that The House is trying to usurp power from the Executive branch. these people make me sick.
I may have been unclear, but agree with that. A fact-finding forum without cross-examination, or oral arguments without ethical restraints can be inherently inefficient and exceedingly dangerous for the defendant.
However, Schiff is turning out to be a much better prosecutor than committee chairman and IMO will gain a vote for witnesses.
If so, it seems prudent to assume that Ciaramella's transcript either does, or will, carefully support the House argument, and Ciaramella survives a Senate deposition. IMO, the House also knows full well Bolton will support their position and views his role as not threatening. (The duration of legal entanglements for both will play right into the D's plans.)
In any event, the rhetorical question is what single supporting witness is available to the WH for response?
...”They keep asking the same stupid questions just rearranging the words”....
Because the Dems operate by repetition.
......
Rules for radicals.. .repeat, repeat, repeat. ...
Crow is such a snake
Collins up. ...
Listened on the radio... I couldn't believe I heard Schiff say "Let's have a trial we can be PROUD of!"
Meaning, "Let's have an impeachment we can be proud of!"
Is he kidding? Do Americans really think this is something to be proud of? I thought Pelosi said impeachments were "divisive," not a moment of pride (unless you got a gold pen, I suppose).
-PJ
They are also usurping the senates powers.
On mute again. Just cannot stand the lies
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.