Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Thatcher

He doesn’t want the book published. He submitted it to the WH so they could reject it. The DEMS will say the WH rejected it to hide evidence incriminating President Trump.

The book isn’t published, and no one is the wiser as to whether there really was anything incriminating in the book.

Bolton can’t be caught lying, because the book won’t be published and the DEMS will still believe it was in the book.

That is the DEM TRICKERY AFOOT.


38 posted on 01/29/2020 12:40:55 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

No, it had to be sent to the WH for clearance. Simon-Shuster would insist since he signed an NDA.

This is standard procedure. And from the 30,000 FT view, I’m suspecting the leaker was NOT named Vindman... probably Bolton himself. Might explain the soil he’s standing on right now.


41 posted on 01/29/2020 12:46:36 PM PST by jimjohn (2020: The year the Republicans can and should take back the black vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson