To: Libloather
The Senate (the Republicans) should agree to and call only one witness- Hunter.
5 posted on
01/24/2020 2:42:04 AM PST by
arthurus
(|:l=|olo|)
To: arthurus
The Senate (the Republicans) should agree to and call only one witness- Hunter. Not just Hunter, but Quid Pro Joe as well
6 posted on
01/24/2020 2:44:19 AM PST by
Mr_Moonlight
(Ich bin ein Irredeemable Deplorable)
To: arthurus
Wouldn't surprise me to see no witnesses and a quick dismissal. Everyone wins, except those seeking the truth. The DEMs get to claim a coverup by the GOP to use for the 2020 campaigns, one of two reasons why they are fine if this ends quickly. The other being having their secrets kept from the public record. The latter applies to many of the GOP in Congress as well.
In addition, the DEMs will just reboot and forge ahead with additional impeachment inquiries with the hope the voting public will tire of the nonsense and just want it to go away. In their case, they hope for Trump to be voted out.
Kabuki theater at its finest.
11 posted on
01/24/2020 2:48:59 AM PST by
CatOwner
To: arthurus
“The Senate (the Republicans) should agree to and call only one witness- Hunter.”
Since “The Call” related to monkey business (crimes) in Ukraine, why stop with Hunter? Call the other three kids of Congress critters who are doing the same thing.
If Schumer wants four, then we want four — Hunter, Pelosi’s kid, and the other two. I hope some of our Senators have the balls that people like Jordan, Stefanik, Ratcliffe, etc., had in the first hearing. We want blood!
45 posted on
01/24/2020 5:39:41 AM PST by
MayflowerMadam
("Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength" - Corrie ten Boom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson