Posted on 01/23/2020 6:56:43 AM PST by Jim Robinson
Senate Impeachment Trial LIVE - day 3
All Nadler is accusing the President of is using his office for political benefit.
As shocking as discovering people gambling in a casino!
It isn’t a crime and it doesn’t even rise to the level of an impeachable offense.
By the Democrats’ new standard, ALL politicians don’t deserve to hold office.
Why is the Senate considering it at all?
Do even Dem Senators like Nadler? I doubt it.
It’s also tiring hearing Nadler, like Schiff, drone on about what the framers wanted...as if they give a hoot about the constitution.
Grahamnsty addressed this “debunked” nonsense with the LSM.
He says he is constantly hearing that it has been “debunked”, he says by whom?
He says I know a lot about the Trump family and their business dealings with Russia, I know nothing about the Biden’s business in Ukraine and I want to know.
He is speaking, great!
He lost me at populists and demagogues.
None of what they advocate is a crime. Where’s the abuse of power here?
Don’t want to watch this rotgut garbage for the next 8 hours.
Omg...he is quoting common law from 1386...
Why is the Senate considering it at all?
Because this is what a trial is. Everyone knew the Dems would drone on and on about Trump, use feathery Framer quotes alot for ‘fill-ins’, and dictate how people should think about it all. While producing ‘Nothing’ as actual evidence of Trumps being guilty.
Nadler sounds like a high school teacher drilling a class.
I’d rather get a root canal than listen to Nadler lecturing to us on how partisanship is a sin.
Its hilarious to watch Democrats accuse Trump of doing what they themselves are guilty of in the Senate.
Prosecuting a partisan impeachment for their own partisan gain.
The reason he can do that is he was there and wrote the law!
Was Nadler around in the 14th Century? America didn’t even exist then!
Aha! Well said.
It’s quite amazing Nadler is using this as a platform to instruct about law, constitution, the framers and what they meant. They just don’t have enough evidence to stand on it’s own so they’re filling in with ‘class instruction’, videos quoting what they’ve already stated...
well I’ll be tuning out now....
Details!! We don’t need details here when it comes to No-Nads.
Actually, when I look at him I see Humpty Dumpty.
Now he is using Alan Dershowitz to explain “Abuse of Power.”
Alan is NOT going to be HAPPY.
________________
I don't know. They look a little like 1950's Jane Russell bras.
:-)
Abuse of power and the article devoted to it doesn’t cite one real crime Trump is guilty of and doesn’t reference any laws he allegedly broke.
The sum total of the Democrat case is Trump took an administrative action they disagree with.
Which ultimately never ended up harming Ukraine: Geez.
Dershowitz disagrees with Nadler and will be more than happy to correct him when the White House Dream Team takes up the President’s case on Saturday.
All this BS because he mentioned Biden on a phone call.
They don’t have evidence so the Democrats are bringing in filler material every one knows.
If you have proof of wrongdoing, you don’t need fluff. You present it!
____________
I can't stand Nadler's history lesson.
I think I'll get my pliers and go back into my bedroom and remove a couple of my teeth.
That would be less painful than this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.