Posted on 01/22/2020 3:12:12 PM PST by kevcol
I wouldn’t be too surprised if he beats this New York case it sounds like there’s lots of holes in the prosecution case
Money and power are the only possible reasons why any woman would allow that disgusting pig to get within 50 yards of her.
But she didn’t know .... how could she? Maybe ask that guy called Slick Willy?
does anyone have a link about Harvey being in charge of the White House cinema during the Clinton period?
can’t recall where I read it.
Remember Spiderman/Stan Lee !
Enlighten me...
d":^)
Was a friend of the predatory Clintons.
There was a big blowup. We all discussed it.
Search still works.
Thanks...
lets go with the oppositions post.
“Crooked Claims About Clinton
Four-time convicted felon falsely accuses Clinton in video viewed by millions.
By Viveca Novak
Posted on January 18, 2008 | Updated on February 8, 2008
Summary
In a video that has logged millions of views on the Internet since early October, Peter Paul, a felon who helped produce a gala fundraiser for the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate campaign, makes a number of false or misleading charges against the presidential contender and former First Lady. Among them:
The video gives the false impression that the Clintons somehow caused Paul to be investigated for securities fraud as retaliation for a lawsuit he filed against them. But the investigation – and Paul’s indictment – came first.
A lawyer appearing on the video claims that a telephone conversation between Paul, Hillary Clinton and others shows that she had knowledge of and perpetrated illegal campaign activities, when the conversation illustrates no such thing. It only shows Hillary thanking organizers of a fundraiser.
The same lawyer alleges that the actions of Clinton and those working for her amounted to “the largest fraud in election funding history,” a claim that is absurd. The campaign was fined for a reporting violation, not “fraud.” And the fine was relatively modest compared with other FEC fines.
The video makes deceptive use of an ABC “20/20” clip in an effort to prove that the Clintons pretended not to know who Paul was after his criminal past came to light.
...
https://www.factcheck.org/2008/01/crooked-claims-about-clinton/
Thanks for the mention of those things, and the link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.