Philbin is making entirely too much sense, not sure if the dims can understand.
Philbin bringing up that Schitt said that if only allowing one side to resent evidence it will give a predetermined outcome.
Philbin points out this is exactly what the House did.
This is too rich.
Love it.
He says the Amendment should be rejected.
The House has 8 min. now to blather, here comes the blather in chief, Zoey.
Philbin’s arguments were very clear.
Now here’s Schiffless, looking for a soundbite.
If schiff were human he would be embarrassed.
Bug eye is up now.I would love to see him and Alan Dershowitz debate.Schiff is a former student of His.