“rash, barely considered, and a danger to America’s superpower standing.”
Or, alternatively, “bold, insightful, and a means of restoring America’s lost superpower standing.” The difference seems to be only one of perspective. Really, all they’ve said is that they disagreed with him.
Exactly. We could abandon the Middle-East entirely and still be a superpower. All that trying to police that region does is get people killed, consume tons of resources better used elsewhere, and engender hatred in most people of that region. I mean we’ve been in Afghanistan longer than Vietnam and have just as little to show for it.