Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen

It would be interesting to know the exact time of the publishing of this piece.

There’s four possibilities:

1. The most amazing coincidence in the history of journalism. Clue squared. The right guy (1 in a 1000) in the right place (1 in 100) on the exact right day (1 in 1000) with (almost) the right weapon (1 in 100). Basically a 1 in 10 billion chance.

2. The author had just heard what happened and updated his story just before publication. Unlikely because editing at the Times takes hours at least.

3. The NYT article was updated after publishing and the Post is mistaken (also unlikely).

4. A deep state operative didn’t want the strike to be successful and so arranged for this otherwise pointless story about hypersonic missiles to be published on short notice as a heads up. But he or she wasn’t privy to the exact timing of the strike (just knew it was coming) and so the article was too late to be noticed by the Iranians in time.


11 posted on 01/07/2020 9:12:24 AM PST by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: edwinland
"What if the former commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, Qassim Suleimani, visits Baghdad for a meeting and you know the address? The temptations to use hypersonic missiles will be many."

Hmmmm.... When was it published as "former" though, if this is the article that was originally published then the use of "former" would mean it would have to have been after the missile strike.

Does anyone have any idea if that word has been altered at all?

14 posted on 01/07/2020 9:24:46 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson